Open Access
Silva Lusitana
Volume 30, Number 2, 2022
Page(s) 57 - 85
Published online 17 May 2023
  • Brescancin, F., Dobšnská, Z., De Meo, I., ŠÁlka, J., Paletto, A., 2018. Analysis of stakeholders' involvement in the implementation of the Natura 2000 network in Slovakia. Forest Policy and Economics 89:22–30. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Grimble, R., Wellard, K., 1996. Stakeholders Methodologies in Natural Resource Management: A Review of Principles, Contexts, Experiences and Opportunities. Agricultural Systems, 55(2):173–193. [Google Scholar]
  • Huitema, D., Adger, W.N., Berkhout, F., Massey, E., Mazmanian, D., Munaretto, S., Plummer, R., Termeer, C.C.J.A.M., 2016. The governance of adaptation: Choices, reasons, and effects. Introduction to the special feature. Ecology and Society 21(3): 37. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • ICNF, 2017. Relatório provisório de incêndios florestais - 2017. 19pp [Google Scholar]
  • ICNF, 2021. Portugal - Perfil Florestal (documento online, acedido em 8/11/2022 - [Google Scholar]
  • ICNF, 2023. Informação oficial do SGIF - Estatísticas totais e regionais 2001 a 2021 (document online, acedido em 28/02/2023 - [Google Scholar]
  • Janssens de Bisthoven, L., Vanhove, M., Rochete, A-J., Hugé, J., Brendonck, L., 2022 Stakeholder Analysis on Ecosystem Services of Lake Manyara Sub-basin (Tanzania): How to Overcome Confounding Factors. Environmental Management, 69:652–665. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mahony, N., Stephansen, H.C., 2017. Engaging with the public in public engagement with research. Research for All 1 (1): 35–51. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Marques, M., Juerges, N., Borges, J.G., 2020. Appraisal framework for actor interest and power analysis in forest management - Insights from Northern Portugal. Forest Policy and Economics, 111:1–14. [Google Scholar]
  • Mendelow, A.L., 1981. Environmental Scanning- The Impact of the Stakeholder Concept. ICIS 1981 Proceedings. [Google Scholar]
  • Ministério da agricultura do mar, Ambiente e ordenamento do território (MAMAOT) e Autoridade florestal nacional (AFN), Pinho, J. (Coord.). (2012). Estratégia para a Gestão das Matas do Nacionais - Versão preliminar. 52pp. [Google Scholar]
  • Paletto, A., Hamunen, K., De Meo, I., 2015. Social Network Analysis to Support Stakeholder Analysis in Participatory Forest Planning. Society & Natural Resources 28(10): 1108–1125. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Paletto, A., Balest, J., Demeo, I., Giacovelli, G., Grilli, G., 2016. Power of Forest stakeholders in the participatory decision-making process: a case study in northern Italy. Acta Silvatica et Lignaria Hungarica 12 (1): 9–22. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Prell, C., Hubacek, K., Reed, M., 2009. Stakeholder Analysis and Social Network Analysis in Natural Resource Management. Society & Natural Resources 22(6): 501–518. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Reed, M.S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., Prell, C., Quinn, C.H., Stringer, L., 2009. Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management 90: 1933–1949. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Reed, M.S., Bryce, R., Machen, R., 2018a. Pathways to policy impact: a new approach for planning and evidencing research impact. Evidence & Policy 14: 431–458. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Reed, M.S., Vella, S., Sidoli Del Ceno, J., Neumann, R.K., De Vente, J., Challies, E., Frewer, L., Van Delden, H., 2018b. A theory of participation: What makes stakeholder and public participation in environmental management work? Restoration Ecology 26(S1): S7–S17. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Reed, M.S., Rudman, H., 2022. Re-thinking research impact: voice, context and power at the interface of science, policy and practice. Sustainability Science, [Google Scholar]
  • Ribeiro C., Valente, S., Coelho, C., Figueirede, E., 2015. A look at forest fires in Portugal: technical, institutional and social perceptions. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 30(4): 317–325. [Google Scholar]
  • Schmeer, K, 2000. Stakeholder Analysis Guidelines. 48pp [acedido em 11/05/2021]. [Google Scholar]
  • Secco, L., Da Re, R., Pettenella, D.M., Gatto, P., 2014. Why and how to measure forest governance at local level: A set of indicators. Forest Policy and Economics 49: 57–71. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Terêncio, D.P.S., Varandas, S.G.P., Fonseca, A.R., Cortes, R.M.V., Fernandes, L.F., Pacheco, F.A.L., Monteiro, S.M., Martins, J., Cabral, J., Santos, J., Cabecinha, E., 2021. Integrating ecosystem services into sustainable landscape management: A collaborative approach. Science of the Total Environment 794. [Google Scholar]
  • Tomé, M., 2018. Programa de Recuperação das Matas Litorais - Sumário Executivo, Comissão Científica do Programa de Recuperação das Matas Litorais, 23 pp. [Google Scholar]
  • Valente, S., Coelho, C., Ribeiro, C., Marsh, G., 2015a. Sustainable Forest Management in Portugal: Transition from Global Policies to Local Participatory Strategies. International Forestry Review 17(3): 368–383. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Valente, S., Coelho, C., Ribeiro, C., Liniger, H., Schwilch, G., Figueiredo, E., Bachmann, F., 2015b. How much management is enough? Stakeholder views on forest management in fire-prone areas in central Portugal. Forest Policy and Economics, 53: 1–11. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wiati, C.B., Indriyanti, S.Y., Maharani, R., Subarudi, 2018. Conflict resolution efforts through stakeholder mapping in Labanan Research Forest, Berau, East Kalimantan, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 144(012063): 1–8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.